LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Mercury 2 vs Hy3 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 31 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Mercury 2Inception
Coding
0.0
Overall
10.8
Output $/M
$0.75
1
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
22.4
Overall
25.3
Output $/M
$0.60
30
vs boards won of 31 shared

Decision reading

Pick Hy3 preview for coding: it scores 22.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 0.0 for Mercury 2.

Pick Mercury 2 when the benchmark that matters is IFBench, where it leads.

Shared results
31
Mercury 2 only
11
Hy3 preview only
5
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Mercury 2 0.0 from 1 benchmark, Hy3 preview 22.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 22.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Mercury 2 1160 against Hy3 preview 1349, 31.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Mercury 2 $0.75 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Mercury 2 takes 128K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryMercury 2BarsHy3 previewTies
Coding07
Intelligence01
Agentic work02
Reasoning05
Knowledge03
General112
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index07
Coding benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDev11711357Hy3 preview
AA Coding Index31.158.8Hy3 preview
SciCode37.7%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)26.5%34.1%Hy3 preview
WeirdML43.2%Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
ALE-Bench785.6Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: coding13901421Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: software and IT13851423Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: React11601349Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: HTML11991356Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index10.825.3Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Agentic work benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic Index1.624.1Hy3 preview
τ²-Bench Telecom70.8%92.7%Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.0%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%27.8%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts13621413Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: expert13581422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13741416Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1442Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Knowledge benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
LMArena Text: science13431416Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13631405Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and finance13491397Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1036Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: UI components998Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: game dev985Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: data viz1009Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: 3D982Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1022Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: SVG998Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art990Not measuredOnly Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index112
General benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
IFBench69.8%63.1%Mercury 2
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)43.7%64.7%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text13541401Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13281383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing12861339Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: English13781409Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: non-English13301390Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14141435Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: Russian13041399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: multi-turn13571411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13291402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13001370Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13141352Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkMercury 2Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Mercury 2 and Hy3 preview
SpecificationInception Mercury 2Tencent Hy3 preview
MakerInceptionTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 4, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.18
Output $/Mtok$0.75$0.60
Coding index0.022.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Mercury 2 better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Pick Hy3 preview for coding: it scores 22.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 0.0 for Mercury 2. Pick Mercury 2 when the benchmark that matters is IFBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Mercury 2 or Hy3 preview?

Mercury 2 costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.75 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Mercury 2 or Hy3 preview?

Hy3 preview, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Mercury 2 vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Mercury 2's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next