Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Extract

Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
S ExtractScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 131K vs 1M context window. Extract fits 7.6x more.

Granite 4.2 8B or Extract: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Granite 4.2 8B has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and LMArena Text: coding; Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Extract not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Extract Free per million output tokens.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Extract 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BExtractLeader
AA Coding Index22.4Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
SciCode31.5%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1367Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BExtractLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.1Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BExtractLeader
AA Agentic Index1.3Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BExtractLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1327Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: expert1386Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1345Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BExtractLeader
LMArena Text: science1336Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1336Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1327Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1322Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BExtractLeader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text1319Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1300Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1236Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: English1337Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1301Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1367Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1282Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1301Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1325Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1269Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1271Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Extract$0.0000Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Extract$0.0020Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Extract$0.0080Fits in one request

Extract costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Extract
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BScaleDown Extract
MakerIBM GraniteScaledown
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026October 13, 2026
Context window131K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.04
Output $/Mtok$0.20Free
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Extract for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Extract?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Extract costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Extract?

Extract, with 1M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Granite 4.2 8B and Extract?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Granite 4.2 8B has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and LMArena Text: coding; Extract has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next