Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Granite 4.2 8B costs 6.0x less per output token than Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($0.20 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 20 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
20
vs boards won of 20 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 6.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
20
Granite 4.2 8B only
7
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
8
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 19.2 points apart on average over 11 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: creative writing: Granite 4.2 8B 1236 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1390, 25.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.20 per million output tokens, 6.0x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Knowledge04
General011
All shared boards020
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
AA Coding Index22.4Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
SciCode31.5%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: coding13781473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT13671461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.1Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.3Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13271442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert13861447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13451451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1459Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1475Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: science13361430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13361376Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: legal and government13271433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance13221430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1245Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index011
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text13191425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following13001430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing12361390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: English13371436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English13011413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese13671424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: Russian12821412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: multi-turn13011414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries13251429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language12691400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12711399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0010Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.024Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.092Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerIBM GraniteReflection
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.20$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 6.0x cheaper ($0.20 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.40 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

20 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next