Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Granite 4.2 8B leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.1 to 8.9, at about the same output price ($0.20 vs $0.22 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 27 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
7
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
20
vs boards won of 27 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.22 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
27
Granite 4.2 8B only
0
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
15
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 5.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Granite 4.2 8B 63.1% against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 75.7%, 12.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding22
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning14
Knowledge04
General210
All shared boards720
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index22
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding Index22.414.4Granite 4.2 8B
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.1%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode31.5%30.6%Granite 4.2 8B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding13781378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: software and IT13661382Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.18.9Granite 4.2 8B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.31.0Granite 4.2 8B
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured40.9%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%11.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts13271348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: expert13861356Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13441376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.0%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1371Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1375Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured79.4%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science13351353Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13321349Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: legal and government13271341Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: business and finance13221345Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index210
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured71.1%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%38.0%Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text13191348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: instruction following13011304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: creative writing12351270Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: English13371378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: non-English13001320Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Chinese13651383Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1396Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian12801304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1302Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13001319Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: longer queries13241300Granite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text: writing and language12691284Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12711294Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerIBM GraniteNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026December 14, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.055
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.22 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

27 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next