Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Granite 4.2 8B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 11.1, and Granite 4.2 8B costs 2.5x less per output token ($0.20 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
4
Granite 4.2 8B only
23
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
12
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 24.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Granite 4.2 8B 45.0% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0%, 24.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.2 8B takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.2 8BBarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
AA Coding Index22.4Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
SciCode31.5%47.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1366Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.126.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Agentic Index1.3Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)63.1%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)9.7%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: hard prompts1327Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: expert1386Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1344Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 14 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LMArena Text: science1335Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1332Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1327Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1322Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1172Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1148Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1110Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1127Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1154Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)45.0%69.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text1319Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1301Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1235Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: English1337Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1300Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1365Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1280Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1300Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1324Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1269Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1271Not measuredOnly Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.2 8BNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerIBM GraniteNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 31, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window131K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.08$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.20$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.2 8B for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($0.20 vs $0.50 per million) and work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Granite 4.2 8B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next