Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Granite 4.0 Micro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads Granite 4.0 Micro on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.9 to 5.1, and Granite 4.0 Micro costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.112 vs $0.22 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

Granite 4.0 MicroIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.112
0
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
11
vs boards won of 11 shared

Granite 4.0 Micro or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.112 vs $0.22 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
11
Granite 4.0 Micro only
2
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
31
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Granite 4.0 Micro not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 85.0 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
AA Math Index: Granite 4.0 Micro 6.0 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 91.0, 85.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Granite 4.0 Micro $0.112 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Granite 4.0 Micro takes 131K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGranite 4.0 MicroBarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math02
Knowledge01
General02
All shared boards011
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured14.4Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)18.0%74.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SciCodeNot measured30.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)1.5%13.6%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1382Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index5.18.9Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom12.6%40.9%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)33.6%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)5.0%11.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)28.3%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Math Index6.091.0Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%91.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
OTIS Mock AIME2.8%Not measuredOnly Granite 4.0 Micro measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1371Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1375Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)44.7%79.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1353Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1349Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1345Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
IFBench24.8%71.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)7.0%38.0%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena TextNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1304Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1270Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1320Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1348Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1269Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1396Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1376Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1304Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1302Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1319Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1300Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1284Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1294Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGranite 4.0 MicroNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0001Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0012Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Granite 4.0 Micro$0.0045Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Granite 4.0 Micro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Granite 4.0 Micro and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationIBM Granite 4.0 MicroNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerIBM GraniteNVIDIA
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 20, 2025December 14, 2025
Context window131K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.017$0.055
Output $/Mtok$0.112$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Granite 4.0 Micro better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Granite 4.0 Micro for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.112 vs $0.22 per million) and work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.0 Micro or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Granite 4.0 Micro costs $0.017 per million input tokens and $0.112 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Granite 4.0 Micro or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Granite 4.0 Micro vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Granite 4.0 Micro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next