Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MythoMax 13B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

MythoMax 13B costs 1.3x less per output token than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace MythoMax 13B Replace Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
G MythoMax 13BGryphe
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
vs $0.40 vs $0.50 per 1M output tokens. MythoMax 13B is 1.3x cheaper.

MythoMax 13B or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MythoMax 13B for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million).

Model AMythoMax 13BGrypheNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BTernary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-mlNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MythoMax 13B not benchmarked, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MythoMax 13B $0.40 against Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
MythoMax 13B takes 8K tokens, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.0006Fits in one request
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.074Exceeds the context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MythoMax 13B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
SpecificationMythoMax 13BPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
MakerGryphePrism-ml
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 2, 2023September 18, 2026
Context window8K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.075
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MythoMax 13B better than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MythoMax 13B for output tokens 1.3x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, MythoMax 13B or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

MythoMax 13B costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MythoMax 13B or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, with 262K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both MythoMax 13B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next