Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MythoMax 13B vs Perceptron Mk1

MythoMax 13B costs 3.8x less per output token than Perceptron Mk1 ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

G MythoMax 13BGryphe
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
Perceptron Mk1Perceptron
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
vs $0.40 vs $1.50 per 1M output tokens. MythoMax 13B is 3.8x cheaper.

MythoMax 13B or Perceptron Mk1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MythoMax 13B for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MythoMax 13B not benchmarked, Perceptron Mk1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MythoMax 13B $0.40 against Perceptron Mk1 $1.50 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
MythoMax 13B takes 8K tokens, Perceptron Mk1 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.0006Fits in one request
Perceptron Mk1$0.0009Fits in one request

MythoMax 13B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Perceptron Mk1$0.012Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.074Exceeds the context window
Perceptron Mk1$0.045Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MythoMax 13B and Perceptron Mk1
SpecificationMythoMax 13BPerceptron Mk1
MakerGryphePerceptron
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 2, 2023May 12, 2026
Context window8K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.40$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MythoMax 13B better than Perceptron Mk1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MythoMax 13B for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($0.40 vs $1.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, MythoMax 13B or Perceptron Mk1?

MythoMax 13B costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Perceptron Mk1 costs $0.15 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MythoMax 13B or Perceptron Mk1?

Perceptron Mk1, with 33K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both MythoMax 13B and Perceptron Mk1?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next