Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

MythoMax 13B vs Mercury 2

MythoMax 13B costs 1.9x less per output token than Mercury 2 ($0.40 vs $0.75 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

G MythoMax 13BGryphe
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
vs $0.40 vs $0.75 per 1M output tokens. MythoMax 13B is 1.9x cheaper.

MythoMax 13B or Mercury 2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick MythoMax 13B for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.75 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. MythoMax 13B has none yet; Mercury 2 on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and SciCode. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
MythoMax 13B not benchmarked, Mercury 2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
MythoMax 13B $0.40 against Mercury 2 $0.75 per million output tokens, 1.9x apart.
Context window
MythoMax 13B takes 8K tokens, Mercury 2 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1171Only Mercury 2 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured31.1Only Mercury 2 measured
SciCodeNot measured37.7%Only Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured26.5%Only Mercury 2 measured
WeirdMLNot measured43.2%Only Mercury 2 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured785.6Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1390Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1385Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1160Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1199Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured10.8Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.6Only Mercury 2 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured70.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured77.0%Only Mercury 2 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.1%Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1362Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1358Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1374Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1343Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1363Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1349Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1035Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured996Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured983Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1010Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured982Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1021Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured997Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured988Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
General benchmarks for MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
BenchmarkMythoMax 13BMercury 2Leader
IFBenchNot measured69.8%Only Mercury 2 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured43.7%Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1354Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1328Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1286Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1378Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1330Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1414Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1304Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1357Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1329Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1300Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1314Only Mercury 2 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.0006Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request

MythoMax 13B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.019Exceeds the context window
Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

MythoMax 13B$0.074Exceeds the context window
Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2
SpecificationMythoMax 13BInception Mercury 2
MakerGrypheInception
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 2, 2023March 4, 2026
Context window8K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.35$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.40$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is MythoMax 13B better than Mercury 2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick MythoMax 13B for output tokens 1.9x cheaper ($0.40 vs $0.75 per million).

Which is cheaper, MythoMax 13B or Mercury 2?

MythoMax 13B costs $0.35 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, MythoMax 13B or Mercury 2?

Mercury 2, with 128K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both MythoMax 13B and Mercury 2?

No benchmark has tested both yet. MythoMax 13B has none yet; Mercury 2 on LMArena WebDev, AA Coding Index and SciCode. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next