Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent vs Schematron V2 Turbo

Schematron V2 Turbo costs 16.7x less per output token than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent ($0.15 vs $2.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentxAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
Schematron V2 TurboInference.net
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.15
vs $2.50 vs $0.15 per 1M output tokens. Schematron V2 Turbo is 16.7x cheaper.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Schematron V2 Turbo: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent for a larger context window (2M against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent not benchmarked, Schematron V2 Turbo not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent $2.50 against Schematron V2 Turbo $0.15 per million output tokens, 16.7x apart.
Context window
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent takes 2M tokens, Schematron V2 Turbo 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent$0.0025Fits in one request
Schematron V2 Turbo$0.0001Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent$0.070Fits in one request
Schematron V2 Turbo$0.0019Fits in one request

Schematron V2 Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent$0.275Fits in one request
Schematron V2 Turbo$0.0075Exceeds the context window

Schematron V2 Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Schematron V2 Turbo
SpecificationSpaceXAI Grok 4.20 Multi-AgentInference.net Schematron V2 Turbo
MakerxAIInference.net
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 31, 2026September 12, 2026
Context window2M128K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.03
Output $/Mtok$2.50$0.15
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better than Schematron V2 Turbo for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent for a larger context window (2M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens; Schematron V2 Turbo costs $0.03 and $0.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent or Schematron V2 Turbo?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent, with 2M tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent and Schematron V2 Turbo?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next