Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT Audio Mini vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs 8.0x less per output token than GPT Audio Mini ($0.30 vs $2.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT Audio MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.40
Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $2.40 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is 8.0x cheaper.

GPT Audio Mini or Voxtral Small 24B 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT Audio Mini for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens).

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT Audio Mini not benchmarked, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT Audio Mini $2.40 against Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
GPT Audio Mini takes 128K tokens, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT Audio Mini$0.0018Fits in one request
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.0003Fits in one request

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT Audio Mini$0.037Fits in one request
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.0059Exceeds the context window

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT Audio Mini$0.144Exceeds the context window
Voxtral Small 24B 2507$0.023Exceeds the context window

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT Audio Mini and Voxtral Small 24B 2507
SpecificationOpenAI GPT Audio MiniMistral Voxtral Small 24B 2507
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 19, 2026October 30, 2025
Context window128K33K
Input $/Mtok$0.60$0.10
Output $/Mtok$2.40$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT Audio Mini better than Voxtral Small 24B 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT Audio Mini for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT Audio Mini or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

GPT Audio Mini costs $0.60 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT Audio Mini or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

GPT Audio Mini, with 128K tokens against 33K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT Audio Mini and Voxtral Small 24B 2507?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next