Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-6 Astra Pro vs Moondream 3.1

Moondream 3.1 costs 20.0x less per output token than GPT-6 Astra Pro ($2.50 vs $50.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-6 Astra ProOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$50.00
M Moondream 3.1Moondream
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.50
vs $50.00 vs $2.50 per 1M output tokens. Moondream 3.1 is 20.0x cheaper.

GPT-6 Astra Pro or Moondream 3.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-6 Astra Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 32K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-6 Astra Pro has results on WeirdML and Chess puzzles; Moondream 3.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-6 Astra Pro not benchmarked, Moondream 3.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-6 Astra Pro $50.00 against Moondream 3.1 $2.50 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-6 Astra Pro takes 1.05M tokens, Moondream 3.1 32K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra Pro and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 Astra ProMoondream 3.1Leader
WeirdML93.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-6 Astra Pro and Moondream 3.1
BenchmarkGPT-6 Astra ProMoondream 3.1Leader
Chess puzzles76.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-6 Astra Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-6 Astra Pro$0.035Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.0015Fits in one request

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-6 Astra Pro$0.650Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.022Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-6 Astra Pro$2.50Fits in one request
Moondream 3.1$0.085Exceeds the context window

Moondream 3.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-6 Astra Pro and Moondream 3.1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-6 Astra ProMoondream 3.1
MakerOpenAIMoondream
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 4, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window1.05M32K
Input $/Mtok$10.00$0.30
Output $/Mtok$50.00$2.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-6 Astra Pro better than Moondream 3.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-6 Astra Pro for a larger context window (1.05M against 32K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-6 Astra Pro or Moondream 3.1?

GPT-6 Astra Pro costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $50.00 per million output tokens; Moondream 3.1 costs $0.30 and $2.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-6 Astra Pro or Moondream 3.1?

GPT-6 Astra Pro, with 1.05M tokens against 32K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-6 Astra Pro and Moondream 3.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-6 Astra Pro has results on WeirdML and Chess puzzles; Moondream 3.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next