Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5 Image vs Relace Search

Relace Search costs 3.3x less per output token than GPT-5 Image ($3.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5 ImageOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
Relace SearchRelace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
vs $10.00 vs $3.00 per 1M output tokens. Relace Search is 3.3x cheaper.

GPT-5 Image or Relace Search: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5 Image for a larger context window (400K against 256K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5 Image has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5 Image not benchmarked, Relace Search not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5 Image $10.00 against Relace Search $3.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5 Image takes 400K tokens, Relace Search 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Image generationDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5 Image and Relace Search
BenchmarkGPT-5 ImageRelace SearchLeader
Design Arena: images1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Image measured
Design Arena: graphic design1172Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Image measured
Design Arena: logos1202Not measuredOnly GPT-5 Image measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5 Image$0.015Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.0025Fits in one request

Relace Search costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5 Image$0.530Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.059Fits in one request

Relace Search costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5 Image$2.10Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.230Fits in one request

Relace Search costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5 Image and Relace Search
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5 ImageRelace Search
MakerOpenAIRelace
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 14, 2025December 8, 2025
Context window400K256K
Input $/Mtok$10.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$3.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5 Image better than Relace Search for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5 Image for a larger context window (400K against 256K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5 Image or Relace Search?

GPT-5 Image costs $10.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Relace Search costs $1.00 and $3.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5 Image or Relace Search?

GPT-5 Image, with 400K tokens against 256K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5 Image and Relace Search?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5 Image has results on Design Arena: images, Design Arena: graphic design and Design Arena: logos; Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next