Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Summarize

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
23.7
Output $/M
$10.00
S SummarizeScaledown
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 400K vs 1M context window. Summarize fits 2.5x more.

Decision reading

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Summarize has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Summarize has the edge where the context window is larger, 1M against 400K tokens.

Shared results
0
GPT-5.1-Codex only
26
Summarize only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Summarize not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Summarize Free per million output tokens.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Summarize 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev1337Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1346Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1018Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
AA Math Index95.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1237Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1138Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexSummarizeLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0000Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0020Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Summarize$0.0080Fits in one request

Summarize costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Summarize
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexScaleDown Summarize
MakerOpenAIScaledown
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025October 13, 2026
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.04
Output $/Mtok$10.00Free
Coding index15.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.892Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Summarize for coding?

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Summarize has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Summarize has the edge where the context window is larger, 1M against 400K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Summarize?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Summarize costs $0.04 and Free. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Summarize?

Summarize, with 1M tokens against 400K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Summarize comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Summarize's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next