GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs 6.4x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex ($1.56 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 5 benchmarks have a result for both.
GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15: which to pick
Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($1.56 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).
- Shared results
- 5
- GPT-5.1-Codex only
- 21
- Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 1 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, so no call is made.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
No call
Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a AA Intelligence Index result, 23.7.
Directional only
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 leads, 1187 against 1161.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 takes 1M tokens against 400K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15
GPT-5.1-Codex $0.0063, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $0.0010 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only GPT-5.1-Codex has the number, $0.892.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Web design, 5.2 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- Design Arena: data viz: GPT-5.1-Codex 1213 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 1135, 9.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
- Context window
- GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 1M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GPT-5.1-Codex | Bars | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Web design | 3 | 2 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 2 |
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 66.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1337 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Vals AI) | 85.5% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) | 13.1% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.9% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 34.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 57.8% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| ALE-Bench | 1244.9 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1346 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here | |||
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 23.7 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1018 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1086 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1191 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 83.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 25.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 95.7 | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 95.7% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 86.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1161 | 1187 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1234 | 1175 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1137 | 1105 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1213 | 1135 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1118 | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1152 | 1166 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
| Design Arena: SVG | Not measured | 1107 | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | Not measured | 1094 | Only Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 70.0% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 69.3% | Not measured | Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | OpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Weights | No public weights listed | No public weights listed |
| Released | November 13, 2025 | February 16, 2026 |
| Context window | 400K | 1M |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.25 | $0.26 |
| Output $/Mtok | $10.00 | $1.56 |
| Coding index | 15.3 | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 2 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | $0.892 | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for coding?
Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for output tokens 6.4x cheaper ($1.56 vs $10.00 per million) and a larger context window (1M against 400K tokens).
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?
GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 and $1.56. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.
Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15?
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, with 1M tokens against 400K.
How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 comparison based on?
5 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex's coding index rests on 2 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.