Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Perceptron Mk1.5

Perceptron Mk1.5 costs 6.7x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex ($1.50 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
Perceptron Mk1.5Perceptron
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
vs $10.00 vs $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Perceptron Mk1.5 is 6.7x cheaper.

GPT-5.1-Codex or Perceptron Mk1.5: which to pick

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Perceptron Mk1.5 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Perceptron Mk1.5 for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $10.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex has results on SWE-bench Verified, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Perceptron Mk1.5 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Perceptron Mk1.5 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Perceptron Mk1.5 $1.50 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Perceptron Mk1.5 37K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev1337Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1346Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1018Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
AA Math Index95.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1237Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1138Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5Leader
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Perceptron Mk1.5$0.0009Fits in one request

Perceptron Mk1.5 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Perceptron Mk1.5$0.012Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1.5 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Perceptron Mk1.5$0.045Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1.5 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexPerceptron Mk1.5
MakerOpenAIPerceptron
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025September 25, 2026
Context window400K37K
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.15
Output $/Mtok$10.00$1.50
Coding index15.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.892Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Perceptron Mk1.5 for coding?

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Perceptron Mk1.5 has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Perceptron Mk1.5 for output tokens 6.7x cheaper ($1.50 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Perceptron Mk1.5?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Perceptron Mk1.5 costs $0.15 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Perceptron Mk1.5?

GPT-5.1-Codex, with 400K tokens against 37K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.1-Codex and Perceptron Mk1.5?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex has results on SWE-bench Verified, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Perceptron Mk1.5 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next