Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex vs Lyria 3 Clip Preview

Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
23.7
Output $/M
$10.00
Lyria 3 Clip PreviewGoogle
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
No data
vs 400K vs 1.05M context window. Lyria 3 Clip Preview fits 2.6x more.

GPT-5.1-Codex or Lyria 3 Clip Preview: which to pick

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Lyria 3 Clip Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Lyria 3 Clip Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex has results on SWE-bench Verified, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Lyria 3 Clip Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks, Lyria 3 Clip Preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 against Lyria 3 Clip Preview Free per million output tokens.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex takes 400K tokens, Lyria 3 Clip Preview 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
SWE-bench Verified66.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev1337Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)85.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)13.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)84.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)34.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench57.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-Bench1244.9Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1346Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1018Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1086Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1191Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
τ²-Bench Telecom83.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
AA Math Index95.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)95.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)86.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
Design Arena: websites1162Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: UI components1237Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: game dev1138Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: data viz1213Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Design Arena: all code categories1152Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-CodexLyria 3 Clip PreviewLeader
IFBench70.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Clip Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Clip Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request
Lyria 3 Clip Preview$0.0000Fits in one request

Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-CodexGoogle Lyria 3 Clip Preview
MakerOpenAIGoogle
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025March 30, 2026
Context window400K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.25Free
Output $/Mtok$10.00Free
Coding index15.3Not benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it20
Cost per solved task$0.892Not computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex better than Lyria 3 Clip Preview for coding?

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; Lyria 3 Clip Preview has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Lyria 3 Clip Preview for a larger context window (1.05M against 400K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex or Lyria 3 Clip Preview?

GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Lyria 3 Clip Preview costs Free and Free. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex or Lyria 3 Clip Preview?

Lyria 3 Clip Preview, with 1.05M tokens against 400K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.1-Codex and Lyria 3 Clip Preview?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex has results on SWE-bench Verified, LMArena WebDev and LiveCodeBench (Vals AI); Lyria 3 Clip Preview has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next