LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Hy3 preview

Updated October 21, 2026. 9 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
6.2
Overall
20.4
Output $/M
$2.00
2
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
22.4
Overall
25.3
Output $/M
$0.60
7
vs boards won of 9 shared

Decision reading

Pick Hy3 preview for coding: it scores 22.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 6.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when the context window is larger, 400K against 262K tokens, or when what matters is IFBench or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Shared results
9
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
13
Hy3 preview only
27
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 6.2 from 1 benchmark, Hy3 preview 22.4 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 29.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 62.9% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 29.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini takes 400K tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniBarsHy3 previewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
General20
All shared boards27
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDev12441357Hy3 preview
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%34.1%Hy3 preview
Terminal-Bench61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1421Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1423Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12531356Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index20.425.3Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom62.9%92.7%Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.5%27.8%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1413Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1422Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
AA Math Index91.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1442Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1405Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1397Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1111Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: UI components1081Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: game dev1093Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: data viz1097Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: 3D988Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categories1094Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: SVG977Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1104Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
IFBench67.9%63.1%GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)66.7%64.7%GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
LMArena TextNot measured1401Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1383Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1339Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1409Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1435Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1370Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Hy3 preview costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3 preview
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniTencent Hy3 preview
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window400K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.18
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.60
Coding index6.222.4
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Pick Hy3 preview for coding: it scores 22.4 on the Vibe Coding Index against 6.2 for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini when the context window is larger, 400K against 262K tokens, or when what matters is IFBench or Long context reasoning (AA-LCR), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Hy3 preview?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Hy3 preview?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next