Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Hy3

Hy3 costs 3.8x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini ($0.528 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
13
vs boards won of 13 shared

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for a larger context window (400K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena WebDev: HTML, where it leads.

Shared results
13
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
9
Hy3 only
31
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 38.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: HTML: GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 1253 against Hy3 1487, 39.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini takes 400K tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniBarsHy3Ties
Coding02
Reasoning02
Web design08
General01
All shared boards013
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
LMArena WebDev12441507Hy3
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench61.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML12531487Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index20.4Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom62.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)81.3%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)18.5%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
AA Math Index91.7Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1473Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1452Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index08
Web design benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
Design Arena: websites11111230Hy3
Design Arena: UI components10781204Hy3
Design Arena: game dev10921208Hy3
Design Arena: data viz10971164Hy3
Design Arena: 3D9881232Hy3
Design Arena: all code categories10931227Hy3
Design Arena: SVG9781200Hy3
Design Arena: ASCII art11051152Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
IFBench67.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)66.7%79.0%Hy3
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1485Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1414Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini and Hy3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniTencent Hy3
MakerOpenAITencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedNovember 13, 2025July 6, 2026
Context window400K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.25$0.132
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for a larger context window (400K against 262K tokens) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena WebDev: HTML, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Hy3?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini or Hy3?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, with 400K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini vs Hy3 comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next