Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max vs MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1 costs 4.5x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ($2.20 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
MiniMax M1MiniMax
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.20
vs $10.00 vs $2.20 per 1M output tokens. MiniMax M1 is 4.5x cheaper.

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max or MiniMax M1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has results on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench; MiniMax M1 on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max not benchmarked, MiniMax M1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max $10.00 against MiniMax M1 $2.20 per million output tokens, 4.5x apart.
Context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max takes 400K tokens, MiniMax M1 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)83.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)22.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Terminal-Bench60.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
ALE-Bench1228.3Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1359Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1359Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.7Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
METR time horizons70.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1339Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1317Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1353Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
ProofBench9.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1361Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1363Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1354Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1355Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1337Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1319Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index17 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
BenchmarkGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1Leader
LMArena TextNot measured1343Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1312Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1297Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1363Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1319Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1360Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1350Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1217Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1266Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1370Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1353Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1329Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1329Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1335Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1326Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1311Only MiniMax M1 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1303Only MiniMax M1 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.0063Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.0015Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.092Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.027Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.350Fits in one request
MiniMax M1$0.102Fits in one request

MiniMax M1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxMiniMax M1
MakerOpenAIMiniMax
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 4, 2025June 17, 2025
Context window400K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.25$0.40
Output $/Mtok$10.00$2.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-5.1-Codex-Max better than MiniMax M1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max or MiniMax M1?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max costs $1.25 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 costs $0.40 and $2.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max or MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1, with 1M tokens against 400K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-5.1-Codex-Max and MiniMax M1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-5.1-Codex-Max has results on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench; MiniMax M1 on LMArena Text: coding, LMArena Text: software and IT and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next