Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Nemotron 3 Super

Nemotron 3 Super costs 22.2x less per output token than GPT-4o ($0.45 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
Nemotron 3 SuperNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.45
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

GPT-4o or Nemotron 3 Super: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Shared results
7
GPT-4o only
21
Nemotron 3 Super only
32
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 42.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GPT-4o 25.1% against Nemotron 3 Super 67.8%, 42.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 per million output tokens, 22.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Nemotron 3 Super 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsNemotron 3 SuperTies
Coding01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
Math01
General02
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured37.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SciCodeNot measured36.2%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%28.8%Nemotron 3 Super
WeirdMLNot measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
ALE-BenchNot measured213.9Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1409Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured12.8Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.7Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%67.8%Nemotron 3 Super
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%80.0%Nemotron 3 Super
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%20.8%Nemotron 3 Super
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1386Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1398Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1397Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
AA Math Index6.0Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1380Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1405Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
MathArena3.6%16.6%Nemotron 3 Super
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1387Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1383Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1392Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1364Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Design Arena: websites831Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: UI components883Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: game dev906Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: data viz858Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: 3D868Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: all code categories860Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
IFBench34.3%71.5%Nemotron 3 Super
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%65.7%Nemotron 3 Super
DTBench64.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMCA16.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena TextNot measured1378Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1347Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1400Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1356Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1431Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1341Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1403Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1418Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1346Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1369Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1362Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1332Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1336Only Nemotron 3 Super measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
BenchmarkGPT-4oNemotron 3 SuperLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Super$0.0056Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Super$0.021Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Super costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Nemotron 3 Super
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024March 11, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.085
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.45
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Nemotron 3 Super for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or τ²-Bench Telecom, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Nemotron 3 Super?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 and $0.45. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Nemotron 3 Super?

Nemotron 3 Super, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Nemotron 3 Super comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Super's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next