Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Mistral Small 3

Mistral Small 3 costs 125.0x less per output token than GPT-4o ($0.08 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
8
Mistral Small 3Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.08
1
vs boards won of 9 shared

GPT-4o or Mistral Small 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
9
GPT-4o only
18
Mistral Small 3 only
27
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 28.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-4o 49.3% against Mistral Small 3 0.0%, 49.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Mistral Small 3 $0.08 per million output tokens, 125.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Mistral Small 3 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsMistral Small 3Ties
Coding10
Agentic work10
Reasoning11
Math20
Knowledge10
General20
All shared boards81
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%25.2%GPT-4o
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1248Only Mistral Small 3 measured
SciCode1.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured6.7Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%19.6%GPT-4o
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%46.2%GPT-4o
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%3.8%Mistral Small 3
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1233Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1202Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
AA Math Index6.04.3GPT-4o
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%4.3%GPT-4o
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1240Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1243Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%65.2%GPT-4o
MMLU88.1%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1235Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1215Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1219Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1205Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
Design Arena: websites831Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: UI components885Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: game dev906Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: data viz858Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: 3D869Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: all code categories861Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
IFBench34.3%26.4%GPT-4o
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%0.0%GPT-4o
DTBench64.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMCA16.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LMArena TextNot measured1234Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1194Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1256Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1198Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1211Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1111Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1188Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1204Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1216Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1217Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1246Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1214Only Mistral Small 3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1184Only Mistral Small 3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Small 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0001Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3$0.011Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Mistral Small 3
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oMistral Small 3
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024January 30, 2025
Context window128K33K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$0.05
Output $/Mtok$10.00$0.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Mistral Small 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o for a larger context window (128K against 33K tokens) and work measured by Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Mistral Small 3?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3 costs $0.05 and $0.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Mistral Small 3?

GPT-4o, with 128K tokens against 33K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Mistral Small 3 comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next