Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o vs Mistral Large 2407

Mistral Large 2407 costs 1.7x less per output token than GPT-4o ($6.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 11 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
9
Mistral Large 2407Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
7.6
Output $/M
$6.00
2
vs boards won of 11 shared

GPT-4o or Mistral Large 2407: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
11
GPT-4o only
15
Mistral Large 2407 only
6
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o not benchmarked, Mistral Large 2407 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 17.8 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): GPT-4o 49.3% against Mistral Large 2407 2.0%, 47.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o $10.00 against Mistral Large 2407 $6.00 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o takes 128K tokens, Mistral Large 2407 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4oBarsMistral Large 2407Ties
Coding10
Agentic work01
Reasoning11
Math20
Knowledge20
General30
All shared boards92
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
SWE-bench Verified38.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Lite38.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)18.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench Multimodal30.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)30.9%26.7%GPT-4o
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured7.6Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom25.1%33.0%Mistral Large 2407
GDPval9.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)54.3%47.2%GPT-4o
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)2.4%2.9%Mistral Large 2407
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured49.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
ARC-AGI4.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-20.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
SimpleBenchNot measured22.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
AA Math Index6.00.0GPT-4o
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)6.0%0.0%GPT-4o
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured8.5%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
MATH level 5Not measured44.8%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.8%68.3%GPT-4o
MMLU88.1%80.0%GPT-4o
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
Design Arena: websites831Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: UI components885Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: game dev906Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: data viz858Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: 3D869Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Design Arena: all code categories861Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
General benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
IFBench34.3%31.6%GPT-4o
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)49.3%2.0%GPT-4o
DTBench64.5%61.2%GPT-4o
LMCA16.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured69.0%Only Mistral Large 2407 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
BenchmarkGPT-4oMistral Large 2407Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.0050Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request
Mistral Large 2407$0.118Fits in one request

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window
Mistral Large 2407$0.460Exceeds the context window

Mistral Large 2407 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o and Mistral Large 2407
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4oMistral Large 2407
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 13, 2024November 19, 2024
Context window128K131K
Input $/Mtok$2.50$2.00
Output $/Mtok$10.00$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o better than Mistral Large 2407 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o for work measured by τ²-Bench Telecom or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o or Mistral Large 2407?

GPT-4o costs $2.50 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Large 2407 costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o or Mistral Large 2407?

Mistral Large 2407, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o vs Mistral Large 2407 comparison based on?

11 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GPT-4o's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Large 2407's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next