Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B cost about the same per output token ($0.60 vs $0.555 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
19
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
12
vs boards won of 31 shared

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
31
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
15
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
7
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 3.7 points apart on average over 20 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Vision: Chinese: GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 1033 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1155, 20.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 128K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)BarsMistral Small 3.1 24BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math20
Knowledge40
General137
All shared boards1912
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
WeirdML11.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: coding12901309Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: software and IT12911301Mistral Small 3.1 24B
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12671278Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: expert12341257Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12781290Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1119Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1158Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math12671261GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: mathematical work12711271GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
SimpleQA Verified8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science12861265GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12821267GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: legal and government13051271GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: business and finance12651257GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index137
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text12861277GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: instruction following12581263Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: creative writing12681252GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Vision10661136Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: English13011295GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: non-English12661255GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: Chinese12651253GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: German12721266GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: Japanese12161208GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: Korean11951207Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: French12971273GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: Spanish12761284Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: Russian12751263GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: Polish12441242GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: multi-turn12851270GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: longer queries12891299Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Text: writing and language12821268GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12531250GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
LMArena Vision: English10721157Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Vision: Chinese10331155Mistral Small 3.1 24B
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1132Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1142Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1153Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1155Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1123Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 22 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Mistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024March 17, 2025
Context window128K128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.351
Output $/Mtok$0.60$0.555
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

Neither: both take 128K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Mistral Small 3.1 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next