Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs 3.3x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
vs $0.60 vs $2.00 per 1M output tokens. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) is 3.3x cheaper.

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has results on Aider polyglot, WeirdML and LMArena Text: coding; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini on LMArena WebDev, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) takes 128K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Aider polyglot3.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1244Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured61.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
WeirdML11.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: coding1290Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1253Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured20.4Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured62.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
BALROG17.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured81.3%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured18.5%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)37.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SimpleBench10.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzles3.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzles12.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCT34.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expert1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 30.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 552.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: math1267Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1271Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
SimpleQA Verified8.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU76.7%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GeoBench64.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: science1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1305Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1111Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1078Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1092Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1097Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured988Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1093Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured978Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1105Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
IFBenchNot measured67.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured66.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)67.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text1286Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1258Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1268Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision1066Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: English1301Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1266Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1265Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: German1272Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1216Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1195Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: French1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1276Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1275Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1244Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1253Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: English1072Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1033Not measuredOnly GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 23 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 18, 2024November 13, 2025
Context window128K400K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.25
Output $/Mtok$0.60$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for output tokens 3.3x cheaper ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, with 400K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) has results on Aider polyglot, WeirdML and LMArena Text: coding; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini on LMArena WebDev, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run). Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next