Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 7.3, and Solar Mini 4 costs 75.0x less per output token ($0.20 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
2
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
2
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
42
Solar Mini 4 only
6
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 24.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 1.8% against Solar Mini 4 25.8%, 24.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 75.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
All shared boards02
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
AA Coding Index24.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.324.1Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%25.8%Solar Mini 4
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: expert1250Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science1295Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1314Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1073Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1105Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1149Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured83.3%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
LMArena Text1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English1312Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: German1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: French1304Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1292Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1302Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1288Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: English1147Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Solar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Upstage Solar Mini 4
MakerOpenAIUpstage
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 13, 2024September 23, 2026
Context window128K524K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.05
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Solar Mini 4?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next