Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.9 to 7.3, and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs 7.9x less per output token ($1.90 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 36 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
36
vs boards won of 36 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
36
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
8
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
13
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 26.3 points apart on average over 3 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: expert: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 1250 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 1442, 32.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 7.9x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge05
General020
All shared boards036
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index24.2Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%64.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured11.4%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: coding12971438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT12971442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.39.9Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured54.1%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%77.2%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%11.9%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12811428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert12501442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1255Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1277Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math12841425Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work12841419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%83.6%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science12951444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12781431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government13141438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance12621433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index020
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBenchNot measured56.5%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.7%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text13001420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following12781406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing12911366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision11371247Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: English13121429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English12831405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese12771463Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German12831424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese12571385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean12341394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French13041452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish12921428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian12851408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13651419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn13021428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries12881419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language12981392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12891368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: English11471256Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: Chinese11321283Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1253Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1209Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1281Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1249Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024September 23, 2025
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.21
Output $/Mtok$15.00$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

36 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next