Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs o3 Mini High

o3 Mini High leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.0 to 7.3, and o3 Mini High costs 3.4x less per output token ($4.40 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
1
o3 Mini HighOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.40
1
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or o3 Mini High: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
2
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
42
o3 Mini High only
1
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, o3 Mini High not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 7.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 24.2 against o3 Mini High 16.3, 7.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against o3 Mini High $4.40 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, o3 Mini High 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Barso3 Mini HighTies
Coding10
Intelligence01
All shared boards11
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
AA Coding Index24.216.3GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: coding1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.311.0o3 Mini High
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.9Only o3 Mini High measured
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: expert1250Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science1295Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1314Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1262Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
LMArena Text1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English1312Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: German1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: French1304Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1292Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1302Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1288Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: English1147Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)o3 Mini HighLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.0033Fits in one request

o3 Mini High costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
o3 Mini High$0.068Fits in one request

o3 Mini High costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
o3 Mini High$0.264Exceeds the context window

o3 Mini High costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and o3 Mini High
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI o3 Mini High
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMay 13, 2024February 12, 2025
Context window128K200K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$1.10
Output $/Mtok$15.00$4.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than o3 Mini High for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or o3 Mini High?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; o3 Mini High costs $1.10 and $4.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or o3 Mini High?

o3 Mini High, with 200K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs o3 Mini High comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o3 Mini High's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next