Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.9 to 7.3, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 68.2x less per output token ($0.22 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 34 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
4
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
30
vs boards won of 34 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
34
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
10
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
8
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 19.6 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run): GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 33.4% against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 74.1%, 40.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 per million output tokens, 68.2x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTies
Coding13
Intelligence01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge05
General314
All shared boards430
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index13
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Coding Index24.214.4GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%74.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SciCodeNot measured30.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured13.6%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding12971378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: software and IT12971382Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.38.9Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured40.9%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%75.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%11.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts12811348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: expert12501356Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English12931376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.0Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.0%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math12841371Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: mathematical work12841375Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%79.4%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science12951353Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare12781349Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: legal and government13141341Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: business and finance12611345Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index314
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
IFBenchNot measured71.1%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured38.0%Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text13001348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: instruction following12781304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: creative writing12911270GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LMArena Vision1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English13121378Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: non-English12831320Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Chinese12771383Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: German12821348Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Japanese12571269Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Korean12341269Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: French13041396Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Spanish12921376Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Russian12851304Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: Polish13651302GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LMArena Text: multi-turn13021319Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: longer queries12881300Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: writing and language12981284GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12891294Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Vision: English1147Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
MakerOpenAINVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024December 14, 2025
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.055
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.22
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for work measured by LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 and $0.22. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B comparison based on?

34 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next