Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Ministral 3 3B 2512

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) leads Ministral 3 3B 2512 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 7.3 to 4.8, and Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs 150.0x less per output token ($0.10 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
2
Ministral 3 3B 2512Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.10
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Ministral 3 3B 2512: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
42
Ministral 3 3B 2512 only
5
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked, Ministral 3 3B 2512 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 19.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 24.2 against Ministral 3 3B 2512 4.8, 19.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 against Ministral 3 3B 2512 $0.10 per million output tokens, 150.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) takes 128K tokens, Ministral 3 3B 2512 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-4o (2024-05-13)BarsMinistral 3 3B 2512Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
All shared boards20
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
AA Coding Index24.24.8GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)33.4%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: coding1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1297Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
AA Intelligence Index7.34.8GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.8Only Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
METR time horizons40.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROG32.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
GPQA Diamond50.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)52.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)1.8%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)48.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1281Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: expert1250Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1293Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
OTIS Mock AIME6.3%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 551.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1284Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)74.0%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MMLU84.2%Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science1295Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1314Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1261Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1027Only Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured948Only Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured963Only Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1009Only Ministral 3 3B 2512 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
LMArena Text1300Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1278Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1291Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision1137Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: English1312Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: non-English1283Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1277Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: German1282Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1257Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean1234Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: French1304Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1292Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Russian1285Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Polish1365Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1302Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1288Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1298Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1289Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: English1147Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1132Not measuredOnly GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
BenchmarkGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ministral 3 3B 2512Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request
Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.0001Fits in one request

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request
Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.0053Fits in one request

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window
Ministral 3 3B 2512$0.021Exceeds the context window

Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-4o (2024-05-13) and Ministral 3 3B 2512
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)Mistral Ministral 3 3B 2512
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMay 13, 2024December 2, 2025
Context window128K131K
Input $/Mtok$5.00$0.10
Output $/Mtok$15.00$0.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-4o (2024-05-13) better than Ministral 3 3B 2512 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Ministral 3 3B 2512?

GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 per million input tokens and $15.00 per million output tokens; Ministral 3 3B 2512 costs $0.10 and $0.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) or Ministral 3 3B 2512?

Ministral 3 3B 2512, with 131K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-4o (2024-05-13) vs Ministral 3 3B 2512 comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Ministral 3 3B 2512's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next