Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs Perceptron Mk1

Perceptron Mk1 costs 1.3x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct ($1.50 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
Perceptron Mk1Perceptron
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
vs $2.00 vs $1.50 per 1M output tokens. Perceptron Mk1 is 1.3x cheaper.

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or Perceptron Mk1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct has results on METR time horizons; Perceptron Mk1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct not benchmarked, Perceptron Mk1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct $2.00 against Perceptron Mk1 $1.50 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct takes 4K tokens, Perceptron Mk1 33K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and Perceptron Mk1
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructPerceptron Mk1Leader
METR time horizons21.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.0025Fits in one request
Perceptron Mk1$0.0009Fits in one request

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.081Exceeds the context window
Perceptron Mk1$0.012Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.320Exceeds the context window
Perceptron Mk1$0.045Exceeds the context window

Perceptron Mk1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and Perceptron Mk1
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructPerceptron Mk1
MakerOpenAIPerceptron
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 28, 2023May 12, 2026
Context window4K33K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.00$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct better than Perceptron Mk1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or Perceptron Mk1?

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Perceptron Mk1 costs $0.15 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or Perceptron Mk1?

Perceptron Mk1, with 33K tokens against 4K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and Perceptron Mk1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct has results on METR time horizons; Perceptron Mk1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next