Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct vs Weaver (alpha)

Weaver (alpha) costs 2.7x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct ($0.75 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
M Weaver (alpha)Mancer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
vs $2.00 vs $0.75 per 1M output tokens. Weaver (alpha) is 2.7x cheaper.

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or Weaver (alpha): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct has results on METR time horizons; Weaver (alpha) has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct not benchmarked, Weaver (alpha) not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct $2.00 against Weaver (alpha) $0.75 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct takes 4K tokens, Weaver (alpha) 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and Weaver (alpha)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo InstructWeaver (alpha)Leader
METR time horizons21.5%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.0025Fits in one request
Weaver (alpha)$0.0008Fits in one request

Weaver (alpha) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.081Exceeds the context window
Weaver (alpha)$0.022Exceeds the context window

Weaver (alpha) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct$0.320Exceeds the context window
Weaver (alpha)$0.087Exceeds the context window

Weaver (alpha) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and Weaver (alpha)
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo InstructMancer Weaver (alpha)
MakerOpenAIMancer
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 28, 2023August 2, 2023
Context window4K8K
Input $/Mtok$1.50$0.40
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct better than Weaver (alpha) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or Weaver (alpha)?

GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Weaver (alpha) costs $0.40 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct or Weaver (alpha)?

Weaver (alpha), with 8K tokens against 4K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct and Weaver (alpha)?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo Instruct has results on METR time horizons; Weaver (alpha) has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next