Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs Mistral Small 4

Mistral Small 4 costs 6.7x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k ($0.60 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
Mistral Small 4Mistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
vs $4.00 vs $0.60 per 1M output tokens. Mistral Small 4 is 6.7x cheaper.

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k or Mistral Small 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has none yet; Mistral Small 4 on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and SciCode. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k not benchmarked, Mistral Small 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k $4.00 against Mistral Small 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 6.7x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k takes 16K tokens, Mistral Small 4 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kMistral Small 4Leader
AA Coding IndexNot measured26.6Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured0.0%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
SciCodeNot measured38.8%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured17.4%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured497.6Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kMistral Small 4Leader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.3Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kMistral Small 4Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured0.8Only Mistral Small 4 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured41.2%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kMistral Small 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured76.9%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured9.9%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured40.5%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kMistral Small 4Leader
IFBenchNot measured48.2%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured49.7%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
DTBenchNot measured70.9%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
LMCANot measured20.6%Only Mistral Small 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.0050Fits in one request
Mistral Small 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.162Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k$0.640Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 4$0.036Fits in one request

Mistral Small 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo 16kMistral Small 4
MakerOpenAIMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 28, 2023March 16, 2026
Context window16K262K
Input $/Mtok$3.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k better than Mistral Small 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k or Mistral Small 4?

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k costs $3.00 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k or Mistral Small 4?

Mistral Small 4, with 262K tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k and Mistral Small 4?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has none yet; Mistral Small 4 on AA Coding Index, Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and SciCode. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next