Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B costs 10.0x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) ($0.20 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
Granite 4.2 8BIBM Granite
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
vs $2.00 vs $0.20 per 1M output tokens. Granite 4.2 8B is 10.0x cheaper.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or Granite 4.2 8B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) has results on GSM8K, MMLU and WinoGrande; Granite 4.2 8B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) not benchmarked, Granite 4.2 8B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) $2.00 against Granite 4.2 8B $0.20 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) takes 4K tokens, Granite 4.2 8B 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.4Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
SciCodeNot measured31.5%Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1378Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1366Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured11.1Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured63.1%Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured9.7%Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1327Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1386Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1344Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
GSM8K46.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
MMLU68.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1335Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1332Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1327Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1322Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)Granite 4.2 8BLeader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured45.0%Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
WinoGrande81.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1319Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1301Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1235Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1337Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1300Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1365Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1280Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1300Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1324Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1269Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1271Only Granite 4.2 8B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.0020Fits in one request
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0002Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.056Exceeds the context window
Granite 4.2 8B$0.0046Fits in one request

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.220Exceeds the context window
Granite 4.2 8B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Granite 4.2 8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)IBM Granite 4.2 8B
MakerOpenAIIBM Granite
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedJanuary 25, 2024August 31, 2026
Context window4K131K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.08
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) better than Granite 4.2 8B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or Granite 4.2 8B?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.08 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B, with 131K tokens against 4K.

Has any benchmark tested both GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and Granite 4.2 8B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) has results on GSM8K, MMLU and WinoGrande; Granite 4.2 8B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and LMArena Text: coding. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next