Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs 3.3x less per output token than GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) ($0.60 vs $2.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
0
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for work measured by MMLU, where it leads.

Shared results
1
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) only
2
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) only
45
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) not benchmarked, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Knowledge, 7.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
MMLU: GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) 68.9% against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 76.7%, 7.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) $2.00 against GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) $0.60 per million output tokens, 3.3x apart.
Context window
GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) takes 4K tokens, GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)BarsGPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Ties
Knowledge01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Aider polyglotNot measured3.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
WeirdMLNot measured11.8%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1289Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1291Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
BALROGNot measured17.4%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured37.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
SimpleBenchNot measured10.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Chess puzzlesNot measured3.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured12.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
VPCTNot measured34.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1235Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1278Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.9%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
FrontierMath, tiers 1 to 3Not measured0.7%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MATH level 5Not measured52.6%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
GSM8K46.9%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1267Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1271Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Knowledge benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured8.3%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
MMLU68.9%76.7%GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
GeoBenchNot measured64.0%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1305Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured67.2%Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
WinoGrande81.6%Not measuredOnly GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) measured
LMArena TextNot measured1286Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1258Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1268Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1066Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1301Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1266Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1265Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1272Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1216Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1195Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1297Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1276Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1275Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1244Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1285Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1289Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1282Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1253Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1072Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1033Only GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
BenchmarkGPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.0020Fits in one request
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0004Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.056Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.0093Fits in one request

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)$0.220Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)$0.036Exceeds the context window

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
SpecificationOpenAI GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)OpenAI GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)
MakerOpenAIOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedJanuary 25, 2024July 18, 2024
Context window4K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.00$0.15
Output $/Mtok$2.00$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) better than GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) for work measured by MMLU, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) costs $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) or GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)?

GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18), with 128K tokens against 4K.

How many benchmarks is the GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613) vs GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18) comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GPT-3.5 Turbo (older v0613)'s coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and GPT-4o-mini (2024-07-18)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next