Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Step 3.7 Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 15 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$4.00
8
Step 3.7 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
19.5
Output $/M
$1.15
5
vs boards won of 15 shared, 2 tied

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

GLM 5V Turbo has the edge where what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
15
GLM 5V Turbo only
50
Step 3.7 Flash only
3
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Step 3.7 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 6.0 points apart on average over 8 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: 3D: GLM 5V Turbo 1209 against Step 3.7 Flash 1129, 10.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Step 3.7 Flash $1.15 per million output tokens, 3.5x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Step 3.7 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsStep 3.7 FlashTies
Coding01
Intelligence10
Agentic work001 tie
Reasoning011 tie
Web design71
General02
All shared boards852 ties
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured39.6Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
SciCodeNot measured43.9%Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%35.6%Step 3.7 Flash
ALE-BenchNot measured694.1Only Step 3.7 Flash measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.519.5GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index00
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%98.5%Tie
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%80.9%Tie
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%21.4%Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index71
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites12301196GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12131179GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12191158GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021172GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D12091129GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12281182GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG11511085GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art11181152Step 3.7 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
IFBench61.1%67.3%Step 3.7 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%73.7%Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboStep 3.7 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.0008Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Step 3.7 Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Step 3.7 Flash$0.051Fits in one request

Step 3.7 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Step 3.7 Flash
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboStepFun Step 3.7 Flash
MakerZ.aiStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026May 28, 2026
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.20
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.15
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Step 3.7 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. GLM 5V Turbo has the edge where what matters is Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Step 3.7 Flash?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Step 3.7 Flash costs $0.20 and $1.15. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Step 3.7 Flash comparison based on?

15 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Step 3.7 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next