Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen-Plus

Qwen-Plus costs 5.1x less per output token than GLM 5V Turbo ($0.78 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 22 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
22
Qwen-PlusQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.78
0
vs boards won of 22 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen-Plus: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
22
GLM 5V Turbo only
43
Qwen-Plus only
6
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Qwen-Plus not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 21.2 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: GLM 5V Turbo 1491 against Qwen-Plus 1347, 23.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Qwen-Plus $0.78 per million output tokens, 5.1x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Qwen-Plus 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsQwen-PlusTies
Coding20
Reasoning30
Math20
Knowledge40
General110
All shared boards220
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: coding14661328GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601343GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.5Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431317GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531328GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561333GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured17.8%Only Qwen-Plus measured
MATH level 5Not measured65.3%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: math14421326GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471332GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
LMArena Text: science14481352GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331350GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361349GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351303GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1213Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1219Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1209Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1228Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index110
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
IFBench61.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
DTBenchNot measured81.1%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMCANot measured24.0%Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text14371326GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231303GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171292GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14541339GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201310GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911347GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1251Only Qwen-Plus measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian14321323GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311336GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381324GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201296GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071270GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboQwen-PlusLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen-Plus$0.015Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Qwen-Plus$0.060Fits in one request

Qwen-Plus costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Qwen-Plus
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboQwen-Plus
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026February 1, 2025
Context window203K1M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.26
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.78
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Qwen-Plus for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen-Plus?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Qwen-Plus costs $0.26 and $0.78. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Qwen-Plus?

Qwen-Plus, with 1M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Qwen-Plus comparison based on?

22 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen-Plus's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next