Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads GLM 5V Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 23.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 8.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
2
vs boards won of 8 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
8
GLM 5V Turbo only
57
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
8
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked.
Widest category
Reasoning, 13.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run): GLM 5V Turbo 17.1% against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 30.7%, 13.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 per million output tokens, 8.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsNemotron 3.5 Super VLTies
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design50
General10
All shared boards62
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench codingNot measured65.5%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
SciCodeNot measured47.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: coding1467Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.526.5Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1026Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1116Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveBench researchNot measured70.9%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browserNot measured4.0%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agenticNot measured15.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench reasoningNot measured78.8%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%30.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: hard prompts1444Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1457Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LMArena Text: science1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Design Arena: websites12301172GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12101148GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12181110GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D12091127GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12271154GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveBench designNot measured60.7%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
LiveBench data analysisNot measured64.6%Only Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBench61.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%69.0%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1424Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1418Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1421Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1444Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1434Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1439Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1421Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1408Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboNemotron 3.5 Super VLLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
MakerZ.aiNVIDIA
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026October 15, 2026
Context window203K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.15
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL comparison based on?

8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next