Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs 7.2x less per output token than GLM 5V Turbo ($0.555 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
37
Mistral Small 3.1 24BMistral AI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.555
0
vs boards won of 37 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or Mistral Small 3.1 24B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
37
GLM 5V Turbo only
28
Mistral Small 3.1 24B only
1
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Mistral Small 3.1 24B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Math, 29.7 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: GLM 5V Turbo 1491 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B 1253, 39.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Mistral Small 3.1 24B $0.555 per million output tokens, 7.2x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Mistral Small 3.1 24B 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsMistral Small 3.1 24BTies
Coding20
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General240
All shared boards370
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: coding14661309GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601301GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.5Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index9 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1070Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1128Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431278GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531257GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561290GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams12861119GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: homework12731158GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: math14421261GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471271GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
LMArena Text: science14481265GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331267GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361271GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351257GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1210Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1218Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1227Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index240
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
IFBench61.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text14371277GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231263GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171252GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision12641136GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: English14541295GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201255GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911253GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221266GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1208Only Mistral Small 3.1 24B measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971207GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431273GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521284GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321263GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321242GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311270GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381299GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201268GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071250GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English12741157GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291155GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text12701132GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: humor12681142GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: captioning12641153GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12411155GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: creative writing12521123GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.0006Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.019Fits in one request

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Mistral Small 3.1 24B$0.076Exceeds the context window

Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Mistral Small 3.1 24B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboMistral Small 3.1 24B
MakerZ.aiMistral AI
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedApril 1, 2026March 17, 2025
Context window203K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.351
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.555
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Mistral Small 3.1 24B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.1 24B costs $0.351 and $0.555. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Mistral Small 3.1 24B?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mistral Small 3.1 24B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next