GLM 5V Turbo vs MiniMax M2
GLM 5V Turbo leads MiniMax M2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 18.6, and MiniMax M2 costs 3.9x less per output token ($1.02 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 42 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 5V Turbo or MiniMax M2: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by IFBench, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 42
- GLM 5V Turbo only
- 23
- MiniMax M2 only
- 8
- Like-for-like categories
- 8 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5V Turbo
GLM 5V Turbo leads, 23.5 against 18.6.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
GLM 5V Turbo
GLM 5V Turbo leads, 1230 against 1143.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiniMax M2
MiniMax M2 takes 205K tokens against 203K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2
GLM 5V Turbo $0.0032, MiniMax M2 $0.0008 per turn.
List prices
Cost per solved task
One SWE-bench Verified task, solved
No call
Only MiniMax M2 has the number, $0.702.
Directional only
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, MiniMax M2 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- General, 16.5 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- LMArena Text: creative writing: GLM 5V Turbo 1417 against MiniMax M2 1286, 21.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against MiniMax M2 $1.02 per million output tokens, 3.9x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, MiniMax M2 205K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5V Turbo | Bars | MiniMax M2 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 5 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 5 | 0 | ||
| Math | 2 | 0 | ||
| Knowledge | 4 | 0 | ||
| Web design | 7 | 0 | ||
| General | 16 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 41 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index50
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | Not measured | 61.0% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1402 | 1297 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 82.6% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 32.6% | 25.8% | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Terminal-Bench | Not measured | 30.0% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1466 | 1371 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1460 | 1373 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1386 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1356 | 1306 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena WebDev: from an image | 1425 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 23.5 | 18.6 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | 1124 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps | 1149 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: agents building mobile apps | 1134 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Android apps | 1267 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: agents building Godot games | 957 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: agents building games | 1102 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: HTML slides | 1060 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: PowerPoint slides | 1126 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | 86.8% | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Vending-Bench 2 | Not measured | $161 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.9% | 77.7% | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 17.1% | 13.7% | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1443 | 1357 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1453 | 1338 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1456 | 1376 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1286 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1273 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | Not measured | 57.8% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 78.3 | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 78.3% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1442 | 1351 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1447 | 1368 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 82.0% | Only MiniMax M2 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1448 | 1348 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1433 | 1367 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1436 | 1349 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1435 | 1336 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index70
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1230 | 1143 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1210 | 1134 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1218 | 1118 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1202 | 1140 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1208 | 1098 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1227 | 1135 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1150 | 1100 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1116 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index161
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 61.1% | 72.3% | MiniMax M2 |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 70.3% | 64.3% | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1340 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1423 | 1329 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1417 | 1286 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1454 | 1364 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1420 | 1313 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1491 | 1366 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: German | 1422 | 1357 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1397 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1443 | 1336 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1452 | 1326 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1432 | 1330 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1432 | 1312 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1431 | 1361 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1438 | 1331 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1420 | 1295 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1407 | 1298 | GLM 5V Turbo |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1274 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1329 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1270 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1268 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: captioning | 1264 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: recognizing things | 1241 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1252 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | Not measured | Only GLM 5V Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
MiniMax M2 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
MiniMax M2 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
MiniMax M2 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5V Turbo | MiniMax M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | MiniMax |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | April 1, 2026 | October 23, 2025 |
| Context window | 203K | 205K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.20 | $0.255 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.00 | $1.02 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | $0.702 |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5V Turbo better than MiniMax M2 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by IFBench, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or MiniMax M2?
GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; MiniMax M2 costs $0.255 and $1.02. Cost per solved task is known for MiniMax M2 only.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or MiniMax M2?
MiniMax M2, with 205K tokens against 203K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs MiniMax M2 comparison based on?
42 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and MiniMax M2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.