Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs Mercury 2

GLM 5V Turbo leads Mercury 2 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 10.8, and Mercury 2 costs 5.3x less per output token ($0.75 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 37 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
35
Mercury 2Inception
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.75
1
vs boards won of 37 shared, 1 tied

GLM 5V Turbo or Mercury 2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 128K tokens) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.

Shared results
37
GLM 5V Turbo only
28
Mercury 2 only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, Mercury 2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 27.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: GLM 5V Turbo 1386 against Mercury 2 1160, 37.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against Mercury 2 $0.75 per million output tokens, 5.3x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, Mercury 2 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsMercury 2Ties
Coding60
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning401 tie
Knowledge30
Web design80
General121
All shared boards3511 tie
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index60
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
LMArena WebDev14021171GLM 5V Turbo
AA Coding IndexNot measured31.1Only Mercury 2 measured
SciCodeNot measured37.7%Only Mercury 2 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%26.5%GLM 5V Turbo
WeirdMLNot measured43.2%Only Mercury 2 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured785.6Only Mercury 2 measured
LMArena Text: coding14661390GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601385GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React13861160GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561199GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.510.8GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.6Only Mercury 2 measured
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1070Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1127Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%70.8%GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%77.0%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%17.1%Tie
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431362GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531358GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561374GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
LMArena Text: science14481343GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331363GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance14351349GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
Design Arena: websites12301036GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components1210996GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev1218984GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021009GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1208982GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12281021GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1151998GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art1117988GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index121
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
IFBench61.1%69.8%Mercury 2
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%43.7%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text14371354GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231328GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171286GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English14541378GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201330GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911414GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian14321304GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311357GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381329GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201300GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071314GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboMercury 2Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.0006Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Mercury 2$0.015Fits in one request

Mercury 2 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Mercury 2$0.058Exceeds the context window

Mercury 2 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and Mercury 2
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboInception Mercury 2
MakerZ.aiInception
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026March 4, 2026
Context window203K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.25
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.75
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than Mercury 2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 128K tokens) and work measured by IFBench, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or Mercury 2?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Mercury 2 costs $0.25 and $0.75. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or Mercury 2?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs Mercury 2 comparison based on?

37 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Mercury 2's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next