Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini

GLM 5V Turbo leads GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 20.4, and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs 2.0x less per output token ($2.00 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
13
GPT-5.1-Codex-MiniOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.00
4
vs boards won of 17 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
17
GLM 5V Turbo only
48
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini only
5
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 35.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5V Turbo 98.5% against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 62.9%, 35.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini $2.00 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniTies
Coding21
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning02
Web design80
General11
All shared boards134
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
LMArena WebDev14021244GLM 5V Turbo
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%33.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Terminal-BenchNot measured61.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561253GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.520.4GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%62.9%GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%81.3%GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%18.5%GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured91.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured91.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured82.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Design Arena: websites12301111GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12131081GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12191092GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021097GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1209988GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12281094GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1151978GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art11171105GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
IFBench61.1%67.9%GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%66.7%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MiniLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.0013Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.018Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini$0.070Fits in one request

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026November 13, 2025
Context window203K400K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.25
Output $/Mtok$4.00$2.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini costs $0.25 and $2.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini, with 400K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next