Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Max

GLM 5V Turbo costs 2.5x less per output token than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
GPT-5.1-Codex-MaxOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
vs $4.00 vs $10.00 per 1M output tokens. GLM 5V Turbo is 2.5x cheaper.

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5V Turbo has results on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-5.1-Codex-Max $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex-Max 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured83.6%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured22.2%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Terminal-BenchNot measured60.4%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1228.3Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 28 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.5Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
METR time horizonsNot measured70.8%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
ProofBenchNot measured9.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex-Max measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1213Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1219Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1209Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1228Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index27 boards measured
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-Codex-MaxLeader
IFBench61.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.0063Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.092Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1-Codex-Max$0.350Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex-Max
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026December 4, 2025
Context window203K400K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$1.25
Output $/Mtok$4.00$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-5.1-Codex-Max for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

GPT-5.1-Codex-Max, with 400K tokens against 203K.

Has any benchmark tested both GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex-Max?

No benchmark has tested both yet. GLM 5V Turbo has results on LMArena WebDev, Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) and LMArena Text: coding; GPT-5.1-Codex-Max on LiveCodeBench (Vals AI), Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI) and Terminal-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next