Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.1-Codex

GPT-5.1-Codex leads GLM 5V Turbo on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.7 to 23.5, and GLM 5V Turbo costs 2.5x less per output token ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 17 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
9
GPT-5.1-CodexOpenAI
Coding
15.3
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
8
vs boards won of 17 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex: which to pick

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena WebDev: HTML, where it leads.

Shared results
17
GLM 5V Turbo only
48
GPT-5.1-Codex only
9
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-5.1-Codex 15.3 from 2 benchmarks.
Widest category
Agentic work, 10.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5V Turbo 98.5% against GPT-5.1-Codex 83.0%, 15.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-5.1-Codex $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-5.1-Codex 400K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-5.1-CodexTies
Coding21
Intelligence01
Agentic work31
Reasoning02
Web design32
General11
All shared boards98
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured66.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena WebDev14021337GLM 5V Turbo
LiveCodeBench (Vals AI)Not measured85.5%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Vibe Code Bench (Vals AI)Not measured13.1%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured84.9%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%34.8%GPT-5.1-Codex
Terminal-BenchNot measured57.8%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
ALE-BenchNot measured1244.9Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML13561346GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.523.7GPT-5.1-Codex
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps11241018GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps11491086GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps11341191GPT-5.1-Codex
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%83.0%GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%86.0%GPT-5.1-Codex
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%25.7%GPT-5.1-Codex
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured95.7Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured95.7%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.0%Only GPT-5.1-Codex measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
Design Arena: websites12301162GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12131237GPT-5.1-Codex
Design Arena: game dev12191138GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12021213GPT-5.1-Codex
Design Arena: 3D1209Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories12281152GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1117Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
IFBench61.1%70.0%GPT-5.1-Codex
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%69.3%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-5.1-CodexLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex$0.0063Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-5.1-Codex$0.092Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-5.1-Codex$0.350Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-5.1-Codex
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-5.1-Codex
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026November 13, 2025
Context window203K400K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$1.25
Output $/Mtok$4.00$10.00
Coding indexNot benchmarked15.3
Independent measurements behind it12
Cost per solved taskNot computable$0.892
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-5.1-Codex for coding?

Only GPT-5.1-Codex has a coding score, 15.3 on the Vibe Coding Index; GLM 5V Turbo has none, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 2.5x cheaper ($4.00 vs $10.00 per million) and work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena WebDev: HTML, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for GPT-5.1-Codex only.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-5.1-Codex?

GPT-5.1-Codex, with 400K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-5.1-Codex comparison based on?

17 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-5.1-Codex's on 2. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next