Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13)

GLM 5V Turbo leads GPT-4o (2024-05-13) on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 23.5 to 7.3, and GLM 5V Turbo costs 3.8x less per output token ($4.00 vs $15.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 33 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
33
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)OpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
27.1
Output $/M
$15.00
0
vs boards won of 33 shared

GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4o (2024-05-13): which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($4.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (203K against 128K tokens).

Shared results
33
GLM 5V Turbo only
32
GPT-4o (2024-05-13) only
11
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo not benchmarked, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 27.6 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: Chinese: GLM 5V Turbo 1491 against GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 1277, 35.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-4o (2024-05-13) $15.00 per million output tokens, 3.8x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-4o (2024-05-13) 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Ties
Coding20
Intelligence10
Reasoning50
Math20
Knowledge40
General190
All shared boards330
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured24.2Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.4%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: coding14661297GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: software and IT14601297GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
AA Intelligence Index23.57.3GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1060Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1126Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
METR time horizonsNot measured40.8%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
BALROGNot measured32.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
GPQA DiamondNot measured50.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%52.6%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%1.8%GLM 5V Turbo
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured48.9%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14431281GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: expert14531250GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14561293GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured6.3%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MATH level 5Not measured51.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: math14421284GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: mathematical work14471284GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.0%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
MMLUNot measured84.2%Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: science14481295GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14331278GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: legal and government14361314GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: business and finance14351262GLM 5V Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Design Arena: websites1230Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: UI components1210Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev1218Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: data viz1202Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1208Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1227Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1150Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1116Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index190
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
IFBench61.1%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text14371300GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: instruction following14231278GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: creative writing14171291GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision12641137GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: English14541312GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: non-English14201283GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Chinese14911277GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: German14221283GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1257Only GPT-4o (2024-05-13) measured
LMArena Text: Korean13971234GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: French14431304GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Spanish14521292GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Russian14321285GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: Polish14321365GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: multi-turn14311302GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: longer queries14381288GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: writing and language14201298GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: entertainment and media14071289GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: English12741147GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: Chinese13291132GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4o (2024-05-13)Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.013Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$0.295Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o (2024-05-13)$1.15Exceeds the context window

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-4o (2024-05-13)
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026May 13, 2024
Context window203K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$5.00
Output $/Mtok$4.00$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-4o (2024-05-13) for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5V Turbo for output tokens 3.8x cheaper ($4.00 vs $15.00 per million) and a larger context window (203K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o (2024-05-13) costs $5.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4o (2024-05-13)?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4o (2024-05-13) comparison based on?

33 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o (2024-05-13)'s on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next