LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4o

Updated October 21, 2026. 12 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

GLM 5V TurboZ.ai
Coding
28.8
Overall
23.5
Output $/M
$4.00
12
GPT-4oOpenAI
Coding
38.8
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$10.00
0
vs boards won of 12 shared

Decision reading

Pick GPT-4o for coding: it scores 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.8 for GLM 5V Turbo.

Pick GLM 5V Turbo when output tokens cost 2.5x less, or when the context window is larger, 203K against 128K tokens.

Shared results
12
GLM 5V Turbo only
53
GPT-4o only
14
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5V Turbo 28.8 from 1 benchmark, GPT-4o 38.8 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Agentic work, 73.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5V Turbo 98.5% against GPT-4o 25.1%, 73.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5V Turbo $4.00 against GPT-4o $10.00 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
Context window
GLM 5V Turbo takes 203K tokens, GPT-4o 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5V TurboBarsGPT-4oTies
Coding10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Web design60
General20
All shared boards120
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured38.8%Only GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench LiteNot measured38.0%Only GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench (full test set)Not measured18.8%Only GPT-4o measured
SWE-bench MultimodalNot measured30.4%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena WebDev1402Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured30.9%Only GPT-4o measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%8.3%GLM 5V Turbo
LMArena Text: coding1466Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1460Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: React1386Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1356Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena WebDev: from an image1425Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
AA Intelligence Index23.5Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
Design Arena: agents building web apps1124Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building full-stack apps1149Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building mobile apps1134Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Android apps1267Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building Godot games957Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: agents building games1102Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: HTML slides1120Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: PowerPoint slides1152Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%25.1%GLM 5V Turbo
GDPvalNot measured9.9%Only GPT-4o measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)80.9%54.3%GLM 5V Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)17.1%2.4%GLM 5V Turbo
ARC-AGINot measured4.5%Only GPT-4o measured
ARC-AGI-2Not measured0.0%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: expert1453Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1456Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1286Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: homework1273Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured6.0Only GPT-4o measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.0%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: math1442Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1447Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured74.8%Only GPT-4o measured
MMLUNot measured88.1%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text: science1448Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1433Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1436Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1435Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index60
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
Design Arena: websites1230831GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: UI components1213885GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: game dev1219906GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: data viz1202858GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1209869GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories1228861GLM 5V Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1151Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1118Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
IFBench61.1%34.3%GLM 5V Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)70.3%49.3%GLM 5V Turbo
DTBenchNot measured64.5%Only GPT-4o measured
LMCANot measured16.6%Only GPT-4o measured
LMArena Text1437Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1423Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1417Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: English1454Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: non-English1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1491Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: German1422Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Korean1397Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1452Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Russian1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: Polish1432Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1431Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1438Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1420Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1407Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: English1274Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1329Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1270Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: humor1268Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1241Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1252Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
LMArena Document1416Not measuredOnly GLM 5V Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
BenchmarkGLM 5V TurboGPT-4oLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
GPT-4o$0.0075Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
GPT-4o$0.155Fits in one request

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5V Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
GPT-4o$0.600Exceeds the context window

GLM 5V Turbo costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5V Turbo and GPT-4o
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5V TurboOpenAI GPT-4o
MakerZ.aiOpenAI
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedApril 1, 2026May 13, 2024
Context window203K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$2.50
Output $/Mtok$4.00$10.00
Coding index28.838.8
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5V Turbo better than GPT-4o for coding?

Pick GPT-4o for coding: it scores 38.8 on the Vibe Coding Index against 28.8 for GLM 5V Turbo. Pick GLM 5V Turbo when output tokens cost 2.5x less, or when the context window is larger, 203K against 128K tokens.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4o?

GLM 5V Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; GPT-4o costs $2.50 and $10.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5V Turbo or GPT-4o?

GLM 5V Turbo, with 203K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5V Turbo vs GPT-4o comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5V Turbo's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and GPT-4o's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next