Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Hy3

Hy3 costs 7.6x less per output token than GLM 5 Turbo ($0.528 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 12 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
8
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
4
vs boards won of 12 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick GLM 5 Turbo for work measured by ALE-Bench or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
12
GLM 5 Turbo only
4
Hy3 only
32
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 7.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: data viz: GLM 5 Turbo 1264 against Hy3 1164, 12.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 7.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Hy3 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsHy3Ties
Coding01
Reasoning02
Web design80
General01
All shared boards84
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1507Only Hy3 measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
ALE-Bench634.0838.6Hy3
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1511Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1487Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.6Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1455Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1473Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1482Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1452Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index80
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
Design Arena: websites12621230GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12601204GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12481208GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12641164GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: 3D12471232GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: all code categories12611227GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: SVG12051200GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: ASCII art11601152GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
IFBench73.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%79.0%Hy3
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1403Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1426Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1485Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1397Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1432Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1414Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Hy3
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboTencent Hy3
MakerZ.aiTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.132
Output $/Mtok$4.00$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for work measured by ALE-Bench or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Hy3?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Hy3?

Hy3, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Hy3 comparison based on?

12 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next