GLM 5 Turbo vs Reka Flash 3
GLM 5 Turbo leads Reka Flash 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 6.4, and Reka Flash 3 costs 20.0x less per output token ($0.20 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.
GLM 5 Turbo or Reka Flash 3: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 66K tokens).
- Shared results
- 7
- GLM 5 Turbo only
- 9
- Reka Flash 3 only
- 5
- Like-for-like categories
- 5 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo leads, 26.6 against 6.4.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only GLM 5 Turbo has a Design Arena: websites result, 1262.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
GLM 5 Turbo
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens against 66K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Reka Flash 3
GLM 5 Turbo $0.0032, Reka Flash 3 $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Reka Flash 3 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 98.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against Reka Flash 3 0.0%, 98.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Reka Flash 3 $0.20 per million output tokens, 20.0x apart.
- Context window
- GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Reka Flash 3 66K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | GLM 5 Turbo | Bars | Reka Flash 3 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 0 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 0 | ||
| General | 2 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 7 | 0 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 43.5% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 33.3% | 0.0% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| ALE-Bench | 634.0 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 26.6 | 6.4 | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 98.5% | 0.0% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| BALROG | Not measured | 29.2% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 84.7% | 52.9% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 27.8% | 4.4% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | Not measured | 33.7 | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 33.7% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 66.9% | Only Reka Flash 3 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1262 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1261 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1247 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1264 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 1248 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1261 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: SVG | 1205 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Design Arena: ASCII art | 1160 | Not measured | Only GLM 5 Turbo measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 73.2% | 30.4% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 71.7% | 0.0% | GLM 5 Turbo |
| Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Reka Flash 3 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Reka Flash 3 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Reka Flash 3 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Z.ai GLM 5 Turbo | Reka Flash 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Z.ai | Reka |
| Weights | No public weights listed | Open weights |
| Released | March 15, 2026 | March 12, 2025 |
| Context window | 203K | 66K |
| Input $/Mtok | $1.20 | $0.10 |
| Output $/Mtok | $4.00 | $0.20 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Reka Flash 3 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick GLM 5 Turbo for a larger context window (203K against 66K tokens).
Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Reka Flash 3?
GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Reka Flash 3 costs $0.10 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Reka Flash 3?
GLM 5 Turbo, with 203K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Reka Flash 3 comparison based on?
7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Reka Flash 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.