Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 3.6x less per output token than GLM 5 Turbo ($1.10 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 2 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
2
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
0
vs boards won of 2 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
2
GLM 5 Turbo only
14
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
26
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 2.3 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: GLM 5 Turbo 1248 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1224, 3.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.10 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Web design20
All shared boards20
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
ALE-Bench634.0Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1473Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.6Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1442Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1447Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1451Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1459Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1475Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1376Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1433Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websites12621250GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: UI components1260Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: game dev12481224GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: data viz1264Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: 3D1247Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories1261Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: SVG1205Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
IFBench73.2%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
LMArena TextNot measured1425Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1390Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1413Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1424Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1412Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1414Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1429Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1400Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1399Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0009Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.021Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.081Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerZ.aiReflection
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window203K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.35
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.35 and $1.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

2 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next