Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

GLM 5 Turbo vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B

GLM 5 Turbo leads Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.6 to 11.9, and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs 2.7x less per output token ($1.50 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 13 benchmarks have a result for both.

GLM 5 TurboZ.ai
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.00
13
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.50
0
vs boards won of 13 shared

GLM 5 Turbo or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
13
GLM 5 Turbo only
3
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
40
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
GLM 5 Turbo not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 55.0 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: GLM 5 Turbo 98.5% against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 43.6%, 55.0 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
GLM 5 Turbo $4.00 against Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
GLM 5 Turbo takes 203K tokens, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryGLM 5 TurboBarsQwen3 Coder 480B A35BTies
Coding20
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
Web design50
General20
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
SWE-bench VerifiedNot measured69.6%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1275Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured58.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)33.3%18.9%GLM 5 Turbo
Terminal-BenchNot measured27.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
GSO-BenchNot measured4.9%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.2%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
ALE-Bench634.0461.4GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1412Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1393Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1257Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1287Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.611.9GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom98.5%43.6%GLM 5 Turbo
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)84.7%61.8%GLM 5 Turbo
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)27.8%4.5%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1372Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1338Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1380Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured49.5%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured39.3Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured39.3%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1365Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1367Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured78.8%Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1347Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1347Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1358Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1343Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Design Arena: websites12621159GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: UI components12631113GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: game dev12481099GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: data viz12641084GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: 3D1248Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: all code categories12621143GLM 5 Turbo
Design Arena: SVG1206Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1160Not measuredOnly GLM 5 Turbo measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
IFBench73.2%40.5%GLM 5 Turbo
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)71.7%45.7%GLM 5 Turbo
LMArena TextNot measured1357Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1355Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1333Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1359Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1346Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1357Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1325Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1311Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1305Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1398Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1360Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1366Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1344Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1366Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1378Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1340Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1317Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
BenchmarkGLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.0032Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.072Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

GLM 5 Turbo$0.280Exceeds the context window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.075Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of GLM 5 Turbo and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B
SpecificationZ.ai GLM 5 TurboQwen3 Coder 480B A35B
MakerZ.aiQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 15, 2026July 23, 2025
Context window203K262K
Input $/Mtok$1.20$0.30
Output $/Mtok$4.00$1.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is GLM 5 Turbo better than Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, GLM 5 Turbo or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

GLM 5 Turbo costs $1.20 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 and $1.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, GLM 5 Turbo or Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B?

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B, with 262K tokens against 203K.

How many benchmarks is the GLM 5 Turbo vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B comparison based on?

13 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. GLM 5 Turbo's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next